In coordinated announcements Friday evening, the State Department confirmed approval of $15.67 billion in military equipment sales to two key Middle Eastern allies. Israel’s $6.67 billion package and Saudi Arabia’s $9 billion allocation represent substantial American investment in regional security architecture during a period of heightened geopolitical tensions and uncertainty.
The Israeli military enhancement program spans four complementary procurement categories designed to address diverse operational requirements. Apache attack helicopters dominate the package at $3.8 billion for 30 aircraft equipped with sophisticated rocket systems and advanced targeting technology, providing Israeli forces with enhanced precision strike capabilities and improved defensive operations along contested borders and within urban environments.
Transportation modernization forms the second pillar of Israeli acquisitions, with 3,250 light tactical vehicles purchased for $1.98 billion to revolutionize ground force mobility. Israeli Defense Forces will utilize these vehicles to accelerate personnel deployment, strengthen supply chains, and extend operational reach across diverse geographic conditions. Additional purchases include $740 million for armored vehicle power system upgrades and $150 million for utility helicopter expansion.
Saudi Arabia’s investment concentrates entirely on defensive capabilities through acquisition of 730 Patriot missiles and supporting infrastructure worth $9 billion. The State Department characterized the sale as essential to American foreign policy objectives, noting that enhanced Saudi air defense protects a major non-NATO ally while improving the collective missile defense system safeguarding Gulf nations, including areas hosting American military personnel.
Congressional oversight concerns have emerged from Democratic representatives questioning the approval process. Representative Gregory Meeks criticized the administration for what he characterized as blatant disregard for congressional prerogatives and established practices, particularly regarding the rushed timeline and insufficient engagement on Gaza reconstruction policies and American-Israeli relations.